flexiblefullpage -
Currently Reading

Top Priorities

Advertisement
billboard -
Architecture

Top Priorities

Cary Bernstein talks about an architect's key criteria for selecting building partners


By By Amy Albert, Editor-in-Chief July 9, 2018
Cary Bernstein photo
This article first appeared in the CB Summer 2018 issue of Custom Builder.
Cary Bernstein has had her own architectural practice for 25 years, creating modern homes that are light-filled and space-savvy with rigorous attention to detail. Bernstein spoke with us about the challenges of designing and building in San Francisco, what she seeks in a builder, and why old relationships and new talent carry equal weight.  
 
Q: Which comes first, the builder you want to work with 
or the design?
 
A: The design comes first, but sometimes we enter into contracts where the client already has a builder in mind. 
 

Related Topics:

 
 
 
Q: What if it’s a builder you’ve never worked with before?
 
A: You want to be a good team player, especially if this is someone with whom the client has a long relationship. You want to have a happy team going into construction. If there are red flags, such as not asking questions during cost estimating, I need to inform the client of my concerns. If the builder has experience with architects with a practice similar to mine, I have no reason to object. 
 
Potrero Residence by Cary Bernstein Architects

Architect: Cary Bernstein Architect, San Francisco https://www.cbstudio.com/

Builder:  Johnstone-McAuliffe Construction, Inc., Pacifica, Calif. http://www.jmc-usa.net/#!/contacts

Interiors:  Cary Bernstein Architect with Owner

Landscape:  Jan Longwell Landscape Architecture, San Francisco http://longwellmacdonald.com/

Photographer:  Cesar Rubio Photography

 
Q: How do you go about finding a builder that would be right for a project?
 
A: Professional and personal referrals are always first. I start by asking other architects, but I’ll also ask consultants and potential clients about working with a particular builder. 
 
Q: What do you look for in the builders you choose to 
work with?
 
A: The first thing is: Does this builder have experience with design-oriented architects? Then there’s the level of skill in construction regarding the client’s expectations for the project. If we’re doing a project with a higher degree of detail and customization, we want a builder experienced with this level of work. On the other hand, a project like a country house we did recently, with common details such as board-and-batten siding, is best done by a local builder who regularly does that kind of thing. If there’s a project I like in the neighborhood, I find out who the builder is. 
The bigger research is for projects outside of San Francisco. For those I have to call on my network or look at publications in which projects are published.
 
Q: How can you tell if a builder “gets” your work?
 
A: If a builder asks questions about places in which there’s a high degree of integration—finishes, materials, structural—it shows he’s putting together the project in his head as he’s reading our documents. A good builder may ask about the documents themselves. As cost estimating and value engineering progress, a good contractor might make recommendations for alternate ways of doing things that are still in line with our design ideas. 
 
Potrero kitchen by Cary Bernstein Architects
 
Q: What’s your ideal scenario?
 
A: Working with the builder from the very early stages of the project to develop it in a cost-effective and collaborative way that meets the client’s design and budget goals. Many builders aren’t comfortable being part of the design process, even though we like to include them. Our smoothest projects come through the negotiated-bid process, rather than a competitive bid. A builder that’s very familiar with the design intent and drawings gives more accurate pricing, and there are fewer surprises during construction.
 
Q: What’s the hardest aspect of choosing the right builder?
 
A: Finding the best fit for budget and quality. Many times, when clients have tight budgets but high design aspirations, they forgo more professional construction firms for smaller contractors that don’t have management team costs. A smaller builder with one or two individuals has lower overhead, but sometimes this translates to an abbreviated management process that has gaps, and this leads to quality-control and accountability issues. 
 
Q: Do you have a preference?
 
A: No, we just want the best level of skill that the project can afford. Professionalism is more important than size. 
 
Q: Do you have a stable of builders you work with?
 
A: We do have contractors and consultants we love working with. We’ve worked with the same structural engineer for 20 years. But as a matter of business, we don’t want just one horse in the barn. That said, it’s good for us and for the client to work with someone regularly. After a while, the conversation becomes shorthand. 
 
Q: What are some of the biggest challenges of working as an architect in San Francisco?
 
A: Everyone would agree that the entitlement process is the biggest challenge. Planning approval is notoriously difficult in San Francisco. It’s not because the planning department is difficult; it’s because the process is long and there are a lot of unknowns due to the way San Francisco allows neighbors to participate in the approvals process. That’s something that the planning department gets blamed for, but it’s really a political problem. 
The second biggest is the cost of construction and labor. The Bay Area is expensive. Contractors have insurance costs. And they have environmental requirements, which everyone is happy to meet, but they 
add cost. There’s also the cost of excavation and alteration to the landscape. As land prices go up, more extreme excavation is being done. Usually foundation costs are one of the most expensive per-square-foot aspects of a project. But real estate prices are getting higher than the cost of basement build-outs. In this hot market, basement builds now make more sense. 
 
Q: Has the labor shortage affected the builders you 
work with?
 
A: Yes. Most of our builders have longtime, loyal staff. That’s what makes them good businesses; their crews have been with them for a while. But in this economy, some builders have lost senior staff who have gone on to start their own firms. There’s some poaching going on. 
 
Q: What about the subcontractors?
 
A: They’re all so busy that it’s hard to manage a schedule. We’ve seen this in boom economies before, when the trades get so busy that they hire less-experienced people who come from elsewhere for a short duration, and with that comes increased risk and more quality problems. 
 
Q: I saw a project of yours that looked recent, but was surprised to learn that it was more than 10 years old. What’s the key to designs that are still fresh years after they’ve been built?
 
A: There are fundamentals that we hope all of our projects have and that contribute to a project that’s great over the long term: A good plan that works, with generous daylight. The other is that the character of the building is true to itself and has logic and visual coherence. We like our projects to be rational and emotional at the same time. You can see the logic, even if you don’t know where it came from, and the project appeals to the emotions—textures, proportions, and details. When we’ve satisfied the mind and emotions, we know we have a good project. We experiment with new materials and technology, but we don’t let the experiment be the defining factor of the project. 
 
 

Related Stories

Case Studies

The Art of Weaving Custom Homes into the Urban Fabric

These homes demonstrate the challenges and opportunities of custom urban infill

Case Studies

A Pittsburgh Rowhouse With a View

Working mostly within the city limits but in a variety of neighborhoods on different building types, architect Darren Lloyd says every project is instructive for projects that follow, regardless of type.

Case Studies

Tuning Into Infill in East Memphis

Memphis-based Archimania is intent on using good design to improve the city.

Case Studies

Cool Desert Design in Tucson

One characteristic common to infill lots is variety. “Infill lots vary depending on what part of the city they’re in,” says architect Luis Ibarra, co…
Project Management

Site-Specific Design: What It Means to Design for Place

Designing custom homes to preserve and enhance the natural qualities of a site

Architecture

A London Pub on the Lake

This custom home on Minnesota’s Lake Minnetonka incorporates the homeowners' love for London into its antique walnut bar

Construction

Net Zero and Beyond

Different roads to energy and resource independence

Design Details

Design Details: Above the Fray

In a densely populated Seattle neighbor­hood, two adjacent infill sites were developed: The Lookout and Shake Shacks

Architecture

Guest Columnist: The Folly of Style in 2021

The inane war brewing between two camps in architecture

Backstory

Backstory: Logical Thinking

How a small architecture and construction firm in Maine became a leader in the prefab and passive House movements

Advertisement
boombox1 -
Advertisement
boombox2 -
Advertisement
native1 -

More in Category


Case Studies

A Pittsburgh Rowhouse With a View

Working mostly within the city limits but in a variety of neighborhoods on different building types, architect Darren Lloyd says every project is instructive for projects that follow, regardless of type.



Advertisement
native2 -
Advertisement
halfpage1 -